Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.
Posted: March 2nd, 2022
Week 6 – Assignment: Prepare Job Descriptions and Calls for Applicants
Instructions
Organization X just recovered funds from a year-long hiring freeze and is preparing for a hiring sweep to fill several much-needed positions. For this assignment, complete the following:
Write a job description for an administrative assistant to top management that will attract individuals who exhibit Public Service Motivation (PSM)-like qualities to Organization X.
After formulating the job description, write a call for applications.
Finally, attach a short reflection in the form of a memo to send to those interviewing potential candidates for the position citing the scholarly literature that explains why you worded the description and call for applications in this way. Keep in mind this memo is a reference for those interviewing prospective candidates. As such, you also want to ensure inclusion of the most helpful information on how to spot candidates with high levels of PSM-like qualities.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
References: Include a minimum of 5 scholarly resources.
Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards where appropriate. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Upload your document, and then click the Submit to Dropbox button.
Battaglio, R. (2015). Public human resource management: Strategies and practices in the 21st century. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd
Kearney, R. C., & Coggburn, J. D. (2016). Public human resource management: Problems and prospects. Los Angeles: CQ Press
Rainey, H. G., & Cook, M. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Week 7 – Assignment: Appraise Strategies to Assist in Effective Job Evaluations
Instructions
Every year, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) conducts the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. One of your areas of expertise is appraisal and evaluation, and as such, you have been invited (in your capacity as Director of Personnel Administration for Organization X) to be on a popular podcast to discuss in what ways, if any, this yearly research could be more effective across the board. The inspiration for the podcast and the prompt comes from a drop in response rates for the 2018 survey. In 2018, the percentage of federal workers who responded to the survey came in at almost five percentage points lower than those who responded to the prior year’s survey. The most concerning part of this drop are it happened on the heels of a push from OPM to improve response rates by moving from a survey sample to a census.
The podcast host emailed you as a courtesy, with the following prompt for the show:
“As you know, if an employer waited until evaluation time to start thinking about an employee’s performance, the employee would be in for a weak evaluation. So, based on your expertise in the field of public service, in what ways (if any) could the OPM’s survey be approached in a way that makes it a bit more realistic and reliable?”
Review the survey in this week’s resources and formulate your response using survey data, the course readings, and any additional outside sources you find pertinent to the topic. You may also include personal experience in your response. Remember to cite your sources.
If you are new to podcasting, the information below might be helpful to you.
Remember, a podcast is a digital media file and may include some audio files, which is what you will create.
Write out your script for the podcast to both time it and to ensure you have included the required content.
Begin your podcast by providing relevant information and establishing a clear purpose that engages the listener.
Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the topic using relevant, quality details that go beyond the obvious.
Focus on your topic.
Be sure to include details from your experience on the topic along with your researched information.
Make sure there is a brief conclusion that connects the information in the podcast.
Use CaptureSpace to record your podcast. Instructions for using CaptureSpace are included in the Course Resources module.
Podcasts are evaluated based on the following information: 1) how well the introduction sets the scene; 2) clarity, accuracy, and relevance of content; 3) whether the conclusion provided a clear summary of the main points; 4) the structure and flow of the podcast, and 5) technical sound quality (volume and clarity). Creativity is also considered.
Support your podcast with at least three scholarly or professional resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.
Length: 10-15 minutes. Be sure to submit a reference page including a link to your podcast
Belle, N., Cantarelli, P., & Belardinelli, P. (2017). Cognitive biases in performance appraisal: Experimental evidence on anchoring and halo
Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., Goswami, S., & Verma, P. (2016). Analyzing the performance appraisal system of a public sector organization in India
Kearney, R. C., & Coggburn, J. D. (2016). Public human resource management: Problems and prospects. Los Angeles: CQ Press
Mulvaney, M. (2017). Performance appraisals in public parks and recreation: A study of employees’ short and longer term attitudes
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (n.d.). Federal employee viewpoint survey. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
https://www.opm.gov/fevs/
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Our writing team is assembled through a rigorous selection process, where we handpick accomplished writers with specialized expertise in distinct subject areas and a proven track record in academic writing. Each writer brings a unique blend of knowledge and skills to the table, ensuring that our content is not only informative but also engaging and accessible to a general college student audience
Competitive pricing is a cornerstone of our service, where we balance affordability with exceptional quality. In offering the best writers at rates that rival other writing services, we ensure that students can access top-notch content without breaking the bank unnecessarily. Our fair and transparent pricing structure is designed to provide value for money, making us a go-to choice for students seeking high-quality writing services at an affordable price.
Academic integrity is paramount to our writing service, which is why we produce original research and writing content for every paper. Each piece of work is carefully written from scratch, ensuring that every sentence, paragraph, and page is authentic and free from plagiarism. Our rigorous quality control process involves thorough scanning of every final draft, guaranteeing that the content meets the highest standards of originality and academic integrity. With keen attention to citation and referencing, we ensure that every source is properly credited, giving you complete peace of mind. We also have the best plagiarism checkers like safeassign and turnitin thus providing similarity score for each paper.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: