Posted: August 13th, 2022

UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society

UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society
Assessment Task 1: Quiz – Semester 2, 2022
Prescribed template for Canberra, Melbourne, North Sydney, Online students

In this quiz you will show your understanding of the principles of Catholic social thought, with reference to the prescribed resources. You will do this in the format of short responses to six quiz questions, using the prescribed template (which is this document).

All students will have 60 hours to submit their responses via Turnitin.

Therefore, the due date for this assessment task is: Sunday, 14 August 2022, 11:00pm AEST.

It is a requirement that you:

a) cite at least the following three readings/resources:

i. Lisa Sowle Cahill, “Catholic Social Teaching,” in The Cambridge Companion to Christian Political Theology, ed. Craig Hovey and Elizabeth Phillips (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) 67–87.
ii. two resources (e.g., LEO book, a linked article, reading (other than Cahill, 2015), a YouTube video, etc.) that are included in the LEO folder/tile for Module 1: Catholic social thought principles (NB: two resources from LEO in total).

Further instructions:
a) This is an open-book quiz.
b) This is not a group exercise. You will complete your responses on your own.
c) The quiz will not be timed (i.e., you can complete the quiz in more than one sitting), but you will only have 60 hours to submit your responses to this task.
d) Students are required to use the prescribed template (which is this document) and upload their completed submission through Turnitin (i.e., we are not using the quiz technology in LEO for this assessment task).

Please note that once you have completed answering the six quiz questions, you will be required to save and submit this document through the ‘Assessment Task 1: Quiz’ Turnitin drop box for marking. You can find the Turnitin drop box in the ‘Assessment’ folder/tile on LEO.
__________________________________________________________________________________

Please write your name and student number here.

Question 1: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

According to Cahill, identify one similarity and one difference between Catholic social teaching and Catholic social thought.

Please write your response to question 1 here.

_________________

Question 2: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

According to Cahill, what social issues did Rerum Novarum seek to address in its historical context?

Please write your response to question 2 here.

_________________

Question 3: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

Rerum Novarum was published by Pope Leo XIII in 1891, more than 130 years ago. Identify one insight that we can garner from this text, based on your reading of Cahill, and relate it to a present context in Australia.

Please write your response to question 3 here.

_________________

Question 4: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.

Using at least one LEO resource* from Module 1, suggest how one Catholic social thought principle (excluding human dignity and the common good) might relate to the experience of migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters. [*LEO resource = LEO book, a linked article, reading, a YouTube video, etc.].

Please write your response to question 4 here.

_________________

Question 5: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.

Using at least one LEO resource from Module 1, suggest how one other Catholic social thought principle (excluding human dignity, the common good and the CST principle you used in answering question 4) might relate to the experience of migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters. [NB: this question is different to question 4 – please read it carefully.].

Please write your response to question 5 here.

_________________

Question 6: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.

If, in Cahill’s words, Catholic social teaching must continue “to grasp that the option for the poor has to become an option of and by the poor, framed from the poor’s perspective” (p. 83), how is this relevant to migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters? [NB: When we refer to “the poor’s perspective,” we’re referring to marginalisation broadly, which includes economic aspects, as well as health, employment, government assistance, etc.].

Please write your response to question 6 here.

_________________

Bibliography/Reference List

Please insert your bibliography/reference list here.

_________________
—-
Sample Answer:

UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society
Assessment Task 1: Quiz – Semester 2, 2022

Please write your name and student number here.

Question 1: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

According to Cahill, identify one similarity and one difference between Catholic social teaching and Catholic social thought.

Catholic social teaching argues that human beings realize fulfillment in society whereas Catholic social thought emphasizes promoting the dignity of all human beings. The focus of the two concepts is the fulfillment, welfare, and dignity of human beings (Cahill, 2015). Catholic social thought and Catholic social teaching both focus on the common good. Catholic social thought is broader than Catholic social teaching since it includes arguments from scholars, movements, and practitioners and it is not limited to formal teachings in the church (Cahill, 2015). Catholic social thought is thus the foundation of Catholic social teaching that promotes the welfare and dignity of human beings.
_________________

Question 2: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

According to Cahill, what social issues did Rerum Novarum seek to address in its historical context?

The social issues that Rerum Novarum attempted to address include the rise of socialism in the wake of industrialization and labor conflict (Cahill, 2015). The focus was to address the dignity of the people by promoting social justice in society. According to him, the church needed to address social issues and speak against evil practices that oppressed the people. Neglect of the duty to speak against evil was unacceptable. Rerum Novarum recognized that poor people had a position in society (Cahill, 2015). According to Rerum Novarum, the poor deserve better treatment since God is on the side of the poor. _________________

Question 3: Your response to this question is to be 100 words – which equates to approximately six lines in this template.

Rerum Novarum was published by Pope Leo XIII in 1891, more than 130 years ago. Identify one insight that we can garner from this text, based on your reading of Cahill, and relate it to a present context in Australia.

Pope Leo XIII in 1891 addressed the issues affecting society by projecting Rerum Novarum’s issues. One of the issues is that unrestricted capitalism would significantly affect society negatively (Cahill, 2015). The Pope was emphasizing the role of protecting the plight of the urban poor in society. The text shows the value of trade unions, collective bargaining, and the intervention of the government in moderating society for the good of the citizens (Cahill, 2015). The objective was to protect the poor who are miserable despite the belief that God is always on the side of the poor fighting for their plight.
_______________

Question 4: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.

Using at least one LEO resource* from Module 1, suggest how one Catholic social thought principle (excluding human dignity and the common good) might relate to the experience of migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters. [*LEO resource = LEO book, a linked article, reading, a YouTube video, etc.].

The selected Catholic social thought is the principle of stewardship and care for creation in addressing the crisis of migrants to Australia. Migrants come to Australia due to war, political unrest, and natural disasters. The principle of stewardship and care for creation involves creating an equitable and sustainable future (Christie et al., 2019). The principle encourages a society with equal opportunities where people share burdens equally. Migrants are human beings who are forced to leave their homes and are potential victims of war crimes or political unrest. Failure to create a sustainable future will mean the world will continue experiencing perennial war and crimes against humanity. Christians are called to be stewards of the world by inviting them to be co-workers with God by creating a friendly environment and sustaining it (Christie et al., 2019). Migrants are at a higher risk of injustice, discrimination, and poverty. The principle of stewardship and care for creation can address the crisis of migrants in Australia.
_________________
Question 5: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.
Using at least one LEO resource from Module 1, suggest how one other Catholic social thought principle (excluding human dignity, the common good and the CST principle you used in answering question 4) might relate to the experience of migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters. [NB: this question is different to question 4 – please read it carefully.].

The selected Catholic social thought principle is the preferential option for the poor and vulnerable. The objective of the principle is to encourage the church and society to create opportunities for the minority and marginalized groups to be heard (Schlag & Melé, 2020). It encourages members of the community to defend the defenseless and promote the good of the entire community. The preferential option for the poor and vulnerable principle is applicable in ensuring justice for defenseless groups such as the migrants. The principle stipulates the need for justice in society and for assisting vulnerable groups (Schlag & Melé, 2020). Migrants who flee their countries due to various reasons have no shelter, food, or job, and are at risk of diseases. The Australian community should give preference to their needs and provide them with shelter and giving them food. Advocacy groups and the church should encourage the government to develop policies that promote justice and a favorable environment for the migrants.
_________________
Question 6: Your response to this question is to be 150 words – which equates to approximately ten lines in this template.

If, in Cahill’s words, Catholic social teaching must continue “to grasp that the option for the poor has to become an option of and by the poor, framed from the poor’s perspective” (p. 83), how is this relevant to migrants to Australia from countries affected by civil/international conflict or natural disasters? [NB: When we refer to “the poor’s perspective,” we’re referring to marginalisation broadly, which includes economic aspects, as well as health, employment, government assistance, etc.].

Catholic social teaching about the poor focus on creating a fair playing field for all stakeholders in a community. The objective is to prevent marginalization in terms of health, economics, and social issues. The Catholic teaching is relevant for the migrants who need equal treatment despite their status (Cahill, 2015). The church should safeguard the rights of the migrants by ensuring they have access to all the government services, health, employment, and economic benefits. The church and government should advocate for equal opportunity among all migrants. Marginalization of the migrants amounts to lack of equal opportunities for the voiceless and defenseless people in the community (Cahill, 2015). The Catholic teaching encourages the prioritization of the poor by encouraging all members of the community to embrace the duty of taking care of their needs (Cahill, 2015). Migrants need special attention to meet their economic, social, physical, and psychological needs. Framing the solutions from the perspective of the poor will generate positive outcomes. _________________

References
Cahill, L. (2015). Catholic Social Teaching. In C. Hovey & E. Phillips (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Political Theology Essay(Cambridge Companions to Religion, pp. 67-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCO9781107280823.005
Christie, I., Gunton, R. M., & Hejnowicz, A. P. (2019). Sustainability and the common good: Catholic Social Teaching and ‘Integral Ecology’as contributions to a framework of social values for sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1343-1354. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11625-019-00691-y
Schlag, M., & Melé, D. (2020). Building institutions for the common good. The practice and purpose of business in an inclusive economy. Humanistic Management Journal, 5(1), 1-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41463-020-00092-9

Check Price Discount

Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: )Considering the NMBA standards for practice »Forgiveness in Christ and being accountable to the state essay