Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.
Posted: March 2nd, 2022
TOPIC:Policy Analysis
PART ONE OF TWO OF THIS ASSISGNEMNT
This assignment will be the first of the two-part policy process assignment in which you will identify and analyze a public health policy. The first assignment is a policy analysis essay and the second assignment will be a redevelopment of the same policy. Visit the National Conference of State Legislation website and select a policy of interest to you. Examples of public health policies include HPV vaccinations, allocation of resources for epidemics, and tobacco and smoking to name a few.
Instructions
For this assignment, do the following:
• Describe a public health issue and an existing policy related to that issue. Discuss the series of events that led to the development of the policy, including epidemiological data that substantiated it.
• Analyze how current policy impacts outcomes for the public health issue and the key stakeholders.
• Evaluate who has the greatest interest in the implementation of the policy.
• Include the alternatives that were considered before this policy was implemented.
• Evaluate whether the policy is achieving its goals and identify the parts of it that are less effective.
• In relation to the public health policy, analyze how cultural values and practices impact its effectiveness.
• Identify the ethical dilemma or trade-offs policymakers must consider regarding this policy.
Review the scoring guide BELOW before developing to ensure you meet all evaluation criteria.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
• Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: Your paper should demonstrate the current APA style and formatting.
• Number of resources: Include a minimum of FOUR resources, appropriately cited throughout your paper and in your reference list.
• Suggested length: 3 typed and double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference list.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Include FOUR academic references above 2017
NO CONSIDERATION FOR PLAGIARISM
APA FORMAT AND INDEX CITATION
PLEASE WRITE FROM PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE
Due 3/3/22 at 10am
MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW ALL Policy Analysis Scoring Guide TO GIAN FULL POINTS
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Describe an existing public health policy and the events that led to its development, including epidemiological data.
12% Does not describe an existing public health policy and the events that led to its development, including epidemiological data. Describes an existing public health policy and the events that led to its development but does not touch on epidemiological data, or the description is otherwise incomplete, inaccurate, or flawed. Describes an existing public health policy and the events that led to its development, including epidemiological data. Describes an existing public health policy and the events that led to its development, including epidemiological data. Cites relevant sources to support the description.
Analyze how a current policy impacts outcomes for a public health issue and key stakeholders.
11% Does not analyze how a current policy impacts outcomes for a public health issue and key stakeholders. Analyzes how a current policy impacts outcomes for a public health issue and key stakeholders but the analysis is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. Analyzes how a current policy impacts outcomes for a public health issue and key stakeholders. Analyzes how a current policy impacts outcomes for a public health issue and key stakeholders. Cites relevant sources to support the analysis.
Evaluate who has the greatest interest in the implementation of a public health policy.
11% Does not evaluate who has the greatest interest in the implementation of a public health policy. Evaluates who has the greatest interest in the implementation of a public health policy but the evaluation is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. Evaluates who has the greatest interest in the implementation of a public health policy. Evaluates who has the greatest interest in the implementation of a public health policy. Explains the reasoning behind the evaluation.
Identify alternatives considered before a public health policy was implemented.
11% Does not identify alternatives considered before a public health policy was implemented. Identifies alternatives considered before a public health policy was implemented but the identification is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. Identifies alternatives considered before a public health policy was implemented. Identifies alternatives considered before a public health policy was implemented. Cites relevant sources to support the identification of alternatives.
Evaluate whether a public health policy is achieving its goals and identify parts of the policy that are less effective.
11% Does not evaluate whether a public health policy is achieving its goals and identify parts of the policy that are less effective. Evaluates whether a public health policy is achieving its goals but does not identify parts of the policy that are less effective, or the evaluation is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. Evaluates whether a public health policy is achieving its goals and identifies parts of the policy that are less effective. Evaluates whether a public health policy is achieving its goals and identifies parts of the policy that are less effective. Cites relevant sources to support the evaluation.
Analyze how cultural values and practices impact a public health policy’s effectiveness.
11% Does not analyze how cultural values and practices impact a public health policy’s effectiveness. Analyzes how cultural values and practices impact a public health policy’s effectiveness but the analysis is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed. Analyzes how cultural values and practices impact a public health policy’s effectiveness. Analyzes how cultural values and practices impact a public health policy’s effectiveness. Suggests ways by which culture can be harnessed to improve the policy’s effectiveness.
Identify ethical issues related to a public health policy.
11% Does not identify ethical issues related to a public health policy. Identifies ethical issues related to a public health policy but the issues are not ethical or they are not relevant to the policy, or important ethical issues are not identified. Identifies ethical issues related to a public health policy. Identifies ethical issues related to a public health policy. Explains why these are ethical issues and how they relate to the policy.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
11% Does not write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Writes clearly and logically, with mostly correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics but with frequent errors and lapses. Writes clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Writes clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Includes smooth transitions between sections of the document.
Correctly format using APA style, including in-text citations and references.
11% Does not correctly format using APA style, including in-text citations and references. Formats using APA style, including in-text citations and references but with frequent errors and lapses. Correctly formats using APA style, including in-text citations and references. Correctly formats using APA style, including in-text citations and references and paraphrases appropriately.
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Our writing team is assembled through a rigorous selection process, where we handpick accomplished writers with specialized expertise in distinct subject areas and a proven track record in academic writing. Each writer brings a unique blend of knowledge and skills to the table, ensuring that our content is not only informative but also engaging and accessible to a general college student audience
Competitive pricing is a cornerstone of our service, where we balance affordability with exceptional quality. In offering the best writers at rates that rival other writing services, we ensure that students can access top-notch content without breaking the bank unnecessarily. Our fair and transparent pricing structure is designed to provide value for money, making us a go-to choice for students seeking high-quality writing services at an affordable price.
Academic integrity is paramount to our writing service, which is why we produce original research and writing content for every paper. Each piece of work is carefully written from scratch, ensuring that every sentence, paragraph, and page is authentic and free from plagiarism. Our rigorous quality control process involves thorough scanning of every final draft, guaranteeing that the content meets the highest standards of originality and academic integrity. With keen attention to citation and referencing, we ensure that every source is properly credited, giving you complete peace of mind. We also have the best plagiarism checkers like safeassign and turnitin thus providing similarity score for each paper.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: