Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.
Posted: May 11th, 2022
Name: NRNP_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
· Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the DSM-5 to use for this Assignment.
·
SELECTED TOPIC: Pedophilia
Follow the rubric. Please Put all bullet points as headings
Include at least 3 or more citations and references
Excellent 90%–100%
Good 80%–89%
Fair 70%–79%
Poor 0%–69%
In 3 pages, address the following:
• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing.
• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing.
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Required Readings National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: NICE Guidelines. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg77 Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. (For review as needed) · Chapter 22, “Personality Disorders” Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (Eds.). (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell. · Chapter 67, “Disorders of Personality” · Chapter 68, “Developmental Risk for Psychopathy” · Chapter 69, “Gender Dysphoria and Paraphilic Sexual Disorders” (pp. 988–993 only) Zakhari, R. (2021). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual. Springer Publishing Company. · Chapter 14, “Personality Disorders” Exit
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Our writing team is assembled through a rigorous selection process, where we handpick accomplished writers with specialized expertise in distinct subject areas and a proven track record in academic writing. Each writer brings a unique blend of knowledge and skills to the table, ensuring that our content is not only informative but also engaging and accessible to a general college student audience
Competitive pricing is a cornerstone of our service, where we balance affordability with exceptional quality. In offering the best writers at rates that rival other writing services, we ensure that students can access top-notch content without breaking the bank unnecessarily. Our fair and transparent pricing structure is designed to provide value for money, making us a go-to choice for students seeking high-quality writing services at an affordable price.
Academic integrity is paramount to our writing service, which is why we produce original research and writing content for every paper. Each piece of work is carefully written from scratch, ensuring that every sentence, paragraph, and page is authentic and free from plagiarism. Our rigorous quality control process involves thorough scanning of every final draft, guaranteeing that the content meets the highest standards of originality and academic integrity. With keen attention to citation and referencing, we ensure that every source is properly credited, giving you complete peace of mind. We also have the best plagiarism checkers like safeassign and turnitin thus providing similarity score for each paper.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: