Posted: May 11th, 2022

NR602 Week 3: Immunization Case Study Assignment

Week Three: Immunization Case Examine Project
By way of this task, the scholar will display the flexibility to:
1. Determine vaccines accessible within the US marketplace for vaccine-preventable illness and describe their options.
2. Determine contraindications and precautions for the usage of vaccines accessible.
Three. Use suggestions from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Apply (ACIP) to establish goal teams for receipt of every vaccine.
Necessities
1. The Immunization task is price 100 factors and will likely be graded on the standard of the content material, use of citations, use of Commonplace English grammar, sentence construction, and general group based mostly on the required parts as summarized within the instructions and grading standards/rubric.
2. Submit the paper as a Microsoft Phrase Doc, which is the required format at Chamberlain College. You’re inspired to make use of the APA Tutorial Author when creating your task.
Three. Comply with the instructions beneath and the grading standards positioned within the rubric carefully. Any questions on this paper could also be posted beneath the Q & A Discussion board or emailed to your college.
four. The size of the paper ought to be 2-Three pages, excluding title web page and reference web page(s). The title and reference pages ought to be in APA format.
5. Vaccination schedules ought to be obtained straight from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention: Sources for Healthcare Suppliers web site and replicate probably the most present suggestions from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Further scholarly assets could also be used and all sources have to be cited appropriately.
Following the instructions above, reply every of the next case state of affairs questions:
Case # 1
You’re rotating within the new child nursery. Your subsequent admission is a time period new child born at Three.5 kg, and all maternal labs are unfavourable. The toddler’s examination is regular.
1. What vaccine(s) ought to she obtain and why?
2. What would you do if the mom examined constructive for Hepatitis B?
Three. What would you do if the mom’s Hepatitis B standing was unknown?
Case # 2
Your first affected person in main care clinic is a wholesome 2-month-old. She obtained Hep B #1 within the nursery. She is a time period toddler and oldsters don’t have any issues. Her examination is regular and there are not any contraindications to giving her vaccines.
1. Which vaccines ought to the kid obtain at this go to?
2. When ought to she return and which of them would you administer on the subsequent go to?
Three. Which vaccination mixtures can be utilized to reduce the variety of needle injections, if accessible?
Case # Three
A wholesome 5-year-old is available in along with her mom for a well-child examine in November. Her routine vaccines are updated by way of 2 years previous, however she has by no means obtained a vaccine for influenza. Her examination is regular.
1. Which vaccines do you advocate at this go to?
2. What anticipatory steering ought to be given for a kid receiving a flu vaccine at this age?
Three. Are there any contraindications for the vaccines that you just advisable right this moment?
Case # four
An 11-year-old woman presents for a routine well-child examine. Her immunizations are updated. Her examination is regular and there are not any contraindications to giving her vaccines.
1. Which vaccine(s) do you advocate at this go to?
2. The mom is states that she solely needs her daughter to have “the one required for varsity this yr however not the others”. How ought to the Nurse Practitioner counsel the mom and the affected person?
Three. The mom is agreeable to proceed with vaccine administration right this moment. Are further doses wanted? If sure, state which of them and when.
Rubric
Immunizations Case Examine Project
Immunizations Case Examine Project
Standards Scores Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Case #1
5 required parts
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #1.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #2.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #Three.
• Acceptable rationale is offered for all responses.
• Sources are applicable and in-text citations correspond with the reference web page. 23.Zero pts
Glorious
5 required parts are met 21.Zero pts
Very Good
four required parts are met 19.Zero pts
Passable
Three required parts are met 12.Zero pts
Wants Enchancment
2 required parts are met Zero.Zero pts
Unsatisfactory
Zero-1 required parts are met
23.Zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Case #2
5 required parts
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #1.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #2.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #Three.
• Acceptable rationale is offered for all responses.
• Sources are applicable and in-text citations correspond with the reference web page. 23.Zero pts
Glorious
5 required parts are met 21.Zero pts
Very Good
four required parts are met 19.Zero pts
Passable
Three required parts are met 12.Zero pts
Wants Enchancment
2 required parts are met Zero.Zero pts
Unsatisfactory
Zero-1 required parts are met
23.Zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Case #Three
5 required parts
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #1.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #2.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #Three.
• Acceptable rationale is offered for all responses.
• Sources are applicable and in-text citations correspond with the reference web page. 23.Zero pts
Glorious
5 required parts are met 21.Zero pts
Very Good
four required parts are met 19.Zero pts
Passable
Three required parts are met 12.Zero pts
Wants Enchancment
2 required parts are met Zero.Zero pts
Unsatisfactory
Zero-1 required parts are met
23.Zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Case #four
5 required parts
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #1.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #2.
• The scholar offers an accurate reply for query #Three.
• Acceptable rationale is offered for all responses.
• Sources are applicable and in-text citations correspond with the reference web page. 23.Zero pts
Glorious
5 required parts are met 21.Zero pts
Very Good
four required parts are met 19.Zero pts
Passable
Three required parts are met 12.Zero pts
Wants Enchancment
2 required parts are met Zero.Zero pts
Unsatisfactory
Zero-1 required parts are met
23.Zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Project Format
Group, spelling, grammar, APA format

There are minimal APA errors eight.Zero pts
Glorious
Zero to 1 APA error is current. 7.Zero pts
Very Good
2–Three APA errors are current. 6.Zero pts
Common
four–5 APA errors are current. four.Zero pts
Wants Enchancment
6–7 APA errors are current. Zero.Zero pts
Unsatisfactory
eight or extra APA errors are current
eight.Zero pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying Consequence Late penalty deductions
College students are anticipated to submit assignments by the point they’re due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will obtain a deduction of 10% of the full factors doable for that task for every day the task is late. Assignments will likely be accepted, with penalty as described, as much as a most of three days late, after which level a zero will likely be recorded for the task. Quizzes and discussions aren’t thought-about assignments and aren’t a part of the late task coverage. Zero.Zero pts
Handbook deduction Zero.Zero pts
Handbook deduction
Zero.Zero pts
Complete Factors: 100.Zero

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Virtual Memory Limits »Typical Small Housing Estate: Flat Roof