Posted: May 11th, 2022

NR512 Health IT Topic of Week Assignment

NR512
HealthIT Subject of Week Project
Pointers with Scoring Rubric
Goal
This task is designed to assist college students
• Develop an appreciation for informatics, fundamental expertise and data required in observe settings. College students will choose a “scorching” or fashionable subject of specific curiosity to their observe to debate. The subject might be chosen from the web site utilizing the hyperlink supplied within the course Assignments part.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT on the finish of Week 5.
Whole Factors Potential: 175
Necessities
College students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT utilizing the hyperlink supplied within the studying task module for Week 5 and choose a “present/fashionable” subject of the week which will influence their observe. College students, in a professionally developed paper, will focus on the rationale for selecting the subject, the way it will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method, citing professionals and cons. Embrace a dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of relevance to growing the task. Within the conclusion, present suggestions for the long run. Submit accomplished FierceHealthIT Subject paper for Wk. 5 to dropbox by finish of Week 5.
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Present/In style Subject of the Week task should be an expert, scholarly ready paper. See the rules for writing an expert, scholarly paper within the Course Sources. The skilled paper can have an introduction, physique of paper to elucidate what you might be doing, abstract/conclusion, and a minimum of three scholarly references.
2. Required texts could also be used as references, however a minimal of three sources should be from outdoors after all readings.
Three. All points of the paper should be in APA format as expressed within the present version.
Four. The paper (excluding the title web page, introduction and reference web page) is Four-6 pages in size.
5. Concepts and knowledge from skilled sources should be cited appropriately.
6. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and citations are according to formal tutorial writing.

Class Factors % Description
Introduction 20 11.Four Introduction presents a short overview of the components of the paper.
Selects related HealthIT Subject to debate; offers rationale for choosing subject 30 17 Supplies convincing rationale for subject choice
Convincing arguments of how subject will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method citing professionals and cons. 40 23 Convincing arguments of how subject impacts observe in a constructive or damaging method; professionals and cons are offered
Dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of relevance to growing the task 30 17 Supplies a dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of to develop the task
Conclusion 20 11.Four Concluding statements summarize insights about the important thing components of the paper gained in the course of the task. Suggestions for the long run are supplied
APA Fashion 20 11.Four Textual content, title web page, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format.
Citations 7 Four Concepts and knowledge from sources are cited appropriately. There are a minimal of three scholarly, present (5 years or much less) references.
Writing Mechanics Eight Four.5 Guidelines of grammar, spelling, phrase utilization, and punctuation are according to formal written work,
Whole 175 100%
A high quality task will meet or exceed the entire above necessities.

GRADING RUBRIC
Project Standards Distinctive
Excellent or highest stage of efficiency Exceeds
Excellent or excessive stage of efficiency Meets
Competent or passable stage of efficiency Wants Enchancment
Poor or failing stage of efficiency Growing
Unsatisfactory stage of efficiency
Content material Potential Factors = 140 Factors

Introduction 20 Factors 18 Factors 16 Factors 14 Factors zero Factors
Introduction presents a short overview all components of the paper. Introduction presents one of many two required components. Introduction doesn’t embrace both of the 2 required components. Minimal try at introduction. No introduction is current.

Selects related HealthIT Subject to debate; offers rationale for choosing subject 30 Factors 26 Factors 24 Factors 21 Factors zero Factors
Efficiently selects related HealthIT Subject to debate; offers rationale for choosing subject Selects related HealthIT Subject to debate; offers minimal rationale for choosing subject Selects HealthIT Subject to debate; not associated to observe; offers minimal rationale for choosing subject Selects HealthIT Subject to debate; not associated to observe; offers no rationale for choosing subject Doesn’t full task
Convincing arguments of how subject will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method citing professionals and cons. 40 Factors 36 Factors 32 Factors zero Factors
Supplies convincing arguments of how subject will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method -pros and cons offered. Some arguments of how subject will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method -pros and cons offered, however should not convincing in nature. Minimal arguments of how subject will influence observe in a constructive or damaging method -pros and cons offered. No dialogue of constructive or damaging influence offered
30 factors 26 factors 24 factors zero Factors
Dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of relevance to growing the task Dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of relevance to growing the task is offered Some dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used within the course of relevance to growing the task. Minimal dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used offered No dialogue of how informatics expertise and data have been used
Conclusion 20 Factors 18 Factors 16 Factors 14 Factors zero Factors
Concluding statements summarize insights about the important thing components of the paper gained in the course of the task. Suggestions for the long run are supplied Supplies a abstract of key factors and a partial abstract of insights gained in the course of the task. Contains some suggestions for future associated to subject. Concluding statements are current however don’t handle insights and/or consists of minimal suggestions for future associated to subject
Minimal concluding statements current however no perception or suggestions for future are offered. No conclusion.

Content material Subtotal_____/140 Factors Minimal concluding assertion.
Format Potential Factors = 35 Factors
APA Fashion 20 Factors 18 Factors 16 Factors 14 Factors zero Factors
zero–1 APA format errors in textual content, title, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format. 2-Three APA format errors in textual content, title web page, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format. Four-6 APA format errors in textual content, title web page, in textual content, title web page, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format. 7-9 APA format errors in textual content, title web page, in textual content, title web page, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format 10 or extra APA format errors in textual content, title web page, in textual content, title web page, physique of paper, abstract and reference web page(s) are fully according to APA format.
Citations Eight Factors 7 Factors 6 Factors Four Factors zero Factors
zero–1 errors in figuring out concepts, and knowledge from different sources are cited appropriately. There are a minimal of three scholarly, present (5 years or much less) references. 2-Three errors in figuring out concepts, and knowledge from different sources are cited.
Four-6 errors in figuring out concepts, and knowledge from different sources are cited.
7-9 errors in figuring out concepts, and knowledge from different sources are cited.
10 or extra errors in figuring out concepts, and knowledge from different sources are cited.

Writing Mechanics 7 Factors 6 Factors 5 Factors Three Factors zero Factors
zero–Three errors in grammar, spelling, phrase utilization, punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing Four–5 errors in grammar, spelling, phrase utilization,
punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing
6-7 errors in grammar, spelling, phrase utilization, punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing
Eight-9 errors in grammar, spelling, phrase utilization, punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing
10 or extra errors in grammar, spelling,
phrase utilization, punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing.
Format Subtotal_____/35 Factors Eight–9 errors in grammar, spelling, phrase utilization, punctuation, and different components of formal tutorial writing

Whole Points____/175 Factors