Top Research Professionals
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
Boost Your Final Grades By Ordering Custom Writing Help!
For similar papers and sample answers; with a few clicks, Order your research paper, thesis, dissertation writing and other assignment help services
Posted: April 14th, 2022
MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC
Sheet1
MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC
SNO Criteria Weight Score Excellent Good Fair Below Proficient
1 Content of Review 40% In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper Points : 40 Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. Points : 34 Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. Points : 28 No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion Points : 24
2 Reflection 30% Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Points : 30 Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings. Points : 25 Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. Points : 21 Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. Points: 18
3 Organization & Development of Ideas 15% Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. Points : 15 Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. Points : 12 Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed. Points : 10 No evidence of structure or organization. Points: 08
4 Mechanics 15% Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA 7 Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 15 Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA 7 guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both. Points : 12 Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA 7 guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines Points : 10 Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors APA 7 format is not used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 08
TOTAL 100%
——
MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC Sheet1
SNO Criteria
Weight Score Excellent Good Fair Fairly Below Proficient
1 Review Content
forty percent
In-depth examination of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent synopsis. Communicates key ideas/themes/findings with exceptional clarity and insight. Both the introduction and conclusion are engaging, and they both indicate the overall focus of the paper. 40 points A thorough examination of the content (most of the major points discussed). A good summary. The key ideas/themes/findings are communicated with considerable clarity, but there is a lack of insight. While the introduction and conclusion are engaging, the paper’s focus is inconsistently supported. 34 points The content has been subjected to only a cursory examination (some of the major points discussed). A brief summary. With little clarity or insight, communicates the key ideas/themes/findings. The introduction and conclusion do not represent the overall
Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: Ethics »Module 02 Discussion – Disorders of the Central Nervous System (CNS)Why Choose our Custom Writing Services
We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by college students.
Discounted Pricing
Our custom writing services maintain the highest quality while remaining affordable for students. Our pricing for research papers, theses, and dissertations is not only fair considering the superior quality but also competitive with other writing services.
0% Similarity Index
We guarantee plagiarism-free, human-written content. Every product is assured to be original and not AI-generated. Our writers, tutors and editors are research experts who ensures the right formating and citation sytles are followed. To note, all the final drafts undergo rigorous plagiarism checks before delivery for submission to ensure authenticity for our valued customers.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: