Posted: August 9th, 2022

M3a2_structuralism | Psychology homework help

Impression of Structuralism

This week you learn and realized about Titchener’s structuralism. As an strategy, structuralism tried to interrupt down consciousness into components of consciousness for examine. It assumed that learning these components of consciousness would result in an understanding of the entire.

Analyze the restrictions and strengths of the strategy of learning consciousness in components.
Establish and talk about one of many major criticisms of structuralism.
Briefly examine and distinction structuralism and behavioralism. How did structuralism affect the creation of behaviorism?
How has structuralism impacted psychology right now? As you think about this query, take into accout the historical past and tradition of the interval wherein Titchener practiced in comparison with your understanding of psychology right now.

Write an essay that’s Three-5 pages in size. Keep in mind to help your arguments with data drawn from the on-line content material, the textbook, and different credible, scholarly sources to substantiate the factors you make.  Apply APA requirements for writing and citations to your work.

**Trace: a helpful article for evaluating and contrasting structuralism with behavioralism is discovered within the AUO library and referenced in your textbook:
Rilling, M. (2000). How the problem of explaining studying influenced the origins and improvement of John B. Watson’s behaviors. The American Journal of Psychology, 113 (2), 275-301. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/224842367/fulltext/12E26E325F56462A087/8?accountid=34899

The paper must be double-spaced 12-point typescript, Occasions Roman font, with 1-inch margins throughout, and free from grammatical errors. Your paper wants to incorporate a canopy web page, summary, and reference listing in APA format.

Grading Standards

Most Factors

Analyzed limitations and strengths of structuralism.

32

Recognized and mentioned one major criticism of structuralism.

32

In contrast and contrasted structuralism with behavioralism.

32

Defined how structuralism influenced the event of behavioralism.

32

Described the affect of structuralism on psychology right now, with consideration of the tradition of the time interval wherein Titchener practiced.

28

Fashion (four factors): Tone, viewers, and phrase selection
Group (12 factors): Introduction, transitions, and conclusion
Utilization and Mechanics (12 factors): Grammar, spelling, and sentence construction
APA Components (16 factors): In textual content citations and references, paraphrasing, and acceptable use of quotations and different components of fashion

_____________________
Analyzing Structuralism’s Limitations and Strengths
Structuralism aimed to understand consciousness by breaking it down into components (Rilling, 2000). While this approach allowed researchers to systematically study individual aspects, it was limited by an inability to reconstruct the whole from its parts (Schultz & Schultz, 2016). Fragmenting consciousness risked oversimplifying its complexity and dynamic nature. However, structuralism’s strengths included establishing psychology as an empirical science and pioneering experimental methods still used today.
A Major Criticism: Ignoring Context and Meaning
A significant criticism of structuralism was its neglect of meaning, context and higher-order processes in favor of analyzing isolated sensations (Schultz & Schultz, 2016). By deconstructing consciousness into basic elements outside of lived experience, structuralism provided an incomplete picture and failed to account for how components interacted to produce meaning (Rilling, 2000). This limitation paved the way for functionalism’s emphasis on relating mental states to their functions.
Structuralism’s Influence on Behaviorism
While structuralism examined internal subjective experiences, behaviorism reacted against this introspective approach and focused solely on observable behaviors (Rilling, 2000). John Watson, a founder of behaviorism, was directly influenced by structuralism yet sought to establish psychology as a natural science by only studying environmental influences on responses (Rilling, 2000). Thus, structuralism both inspired behaviorism’s experimental rigor but also provoked its rejection of introspection and mental processes (Schultz & Schultz, 2016).
Structuralism’s Contemporary Impact
Today, structuralism’s legacy lives on in psychology’s emphasis on empiricism, experimental methods and analyzing mental components (Schultz & Schultz, 2016). However, the field has largely moved beyond structuralism’s limitations by embracing functional approaches that reintegrate meaning, context and dynamic interactions between levels of analysis (Rilling, 2000). Modern cognitive, neuroscientific and systems approaches aim to understand consciousness and behavior as emergent from complex interactions rather than isolated parts (Schultz & Schultz, 2016).
In summary, analyzing the key assumptions and criticisms of structuralism provides valuable historical context for appreciating psychology’s philosophical development. I hope this essay overview has been helpful for your studies. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.
Rilling, M. (2000). How the problem of explaining learning influenced the origins and development of John B. Watson’s behaviorism. The American Journal of Psychology, 113(2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423467 research essay writing service
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). A history of modern psychology (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.