Posted: February 11th, 2022

IS NUCLEAR ENERGY A SAFE ALTERNATIVE SOURCE OF ENERGY

IS NUCLEAR ENERGY A SAFE ALTERNATIVE SOURCE OF ENERGY

I gave you all the material you need for the assingnment in the attachments. Please you foot notes. Please read the supplement to follow the instructions exactly as it say please. and read this brief information:
The paper is a persuasive research paper that is 4-1/2 to 5-1/2 pages.
The paper requires 5 sources minimum.
One source must be an online journal article;
One must be a book.
Only two sources may be regular, scholarly websites.
An unlimited number of online journal articles may be used.
While the Bible may be used, it does not count as one of the required sources. It is best to back up your explanation of the Bible with experts on the Bible (for example, Bible commentaries).
Do not cite from a general encyclopedia or a dictionary.
Use informal parenthetical notes (((author, page number))) to document sources in this draft. (We will convert the informal parenthetical notes to footnotes in the second draft.)
September 23, 2019
Of the renewable energies, nuclear power is by far the worst and most harmful form of energy creation that is considered better than fossil fuel. Its nonetheless a better, consistent, and reliable alternative than fossil fuels. For the most part, it is because of the side effects of nuclear energy on the environment and the people that provides the foundation of its criticism. Instituting better management and monitoring standards on nuclear production allows countries to benefit the most from its use. Nuclear energy it requires a more significant economic and human costs to establish it and maintain operations when compared to others. One of the main reasons why nuclear energy has been dramatically adapted into most grids across the globe is because it has the potential to produce large amounts of power over a relatively small surface and this has dramatically spurred production. But more than this nuclear production needs expertise and continued cooperation between nations to ensure more considerable developments which ultimately introduces a geopolitical angle into the equations. Being an expensive source of energy generations, harmful to the environment, hard to dispose of the byproduct and inherently vulnerable to external attacks, nuclear power is not as helpful as the other forms of renewable energy and should, therefore, be reconsidered in the long term. It is nonetheless the best source of energy for developing nations who need constant access to electricity at a relatively cheaper cost.
Nuclear power’s eco-friendliness comes from the fact that there is less carbon based pollution of the environment and a large amount of electricity in the end of the process. Researchers identify that “Most supporters of nuclear energy point out the low carbon emission aspect of nuclear energy as its major characteristic to be defined as renewable energy” Production of electricity and preservation of the environment are among the priorities of most governments across the world as they are vital for the long term stability, development and economic growth. For this, most governments have continually considered the amount of risk and possible advantages nuclear energy could have on the environment and in so doing considered its impact as a whole. This has been so evident in the Asian region’s economic growth but still its impacts within the environment in the long term remain a mystery for most people in the public who benefit the most from it and stand to be affected the most by its failure.
With limited carbon emission and high standards of use in place, the potential for damages brought about through used of nuclear energy remain to be far little compared to the benefits that the use of nuclear energy would bring. As such it is important to look into past tragedies. The Fukushima reactor meltdown and the Chernobyl incidents in Japan and Ukraine respectively remain justify this claim as on the occurrence of the disasters was when the public started showing concerns for nuclear dependency, low standards, increased environmental vulnerability and its potential harm. At the same time, dismissing nuclear energy as potential harm for the ecosystem will slow down growth and paralyze majority of the growth achieved within the developing and already developed Asian regions. Therefore, researching how nuclear power would in turn affect the environment and the whole ecosystem as a whole and the potential benefits from either building or slowing nuclear power uptake presents a great learning opportunity into how nuclear is limiting climate change in the world and at the same time offer a reason why it is considered to be a sustainable process. Researchers identify that “There are six key issues in regard to the use of nuclear energy according to the energy committee. These are: safety, nuclear waste, economic competitiveness, life-cycle analysis, fuel-availability, and non-proliferation.” While nuclear is a very important and ever persisting threat to human development and organization, creation of safe developmental structures and policies nuclear use would be a great way to avoid catastrophic losses.
Nuclear power plants are costly and to build and maintain considering there is a vast variety of alternatives ready for development with virtually near zero irreversible side effect on the natural environment. Additionally, nuclear plants waste remains active for thousands of years, and this makes it hard to dispose of presenting new threats to the environment. Researchers identify that “That waste can also be reprocessed and recycled, although the United States does not currently do this.” While people think that nuclear energy waste are produced in vast amounts, the true amount is low and require great efforts to maintain. Nuclear energy waste require consistently monitoring, good storage and regularly appraisal for seepage resulting in more avenues for cost incurrence. Nuclear power plants are all the same still considered “green” energy technology. This is based on the fact that they produce little waste compared to other alternative. Still the term has worked for most proponents of nuclear as it has brought about an increase in nuclear power plants construction across the world. In Asia specifically, nuclear uptake has been a good reason as to why most of the regions development has been fast tracked as it has brought down production related costs and increased investment . But still it remains a relatively risky proposition that in the end, remains unresolved with regard to its health.
One major limitation is that nuclear power keeps developing nations poorer. This is because wealthier countries impose bans and embargos on developing nations trying to acquire nuclear energy since they apply the same amount of technology when developing nuclear power as the one they use in developing nuclear weapons. The primary resource in use of nuclear, Uranium is usually limited in supply across the global market as it is a finite natural resource that requires importation. Researchers identify that “Uranium is a weakly radioactive element found in the Earth’s crust.” This results in decreased world cohesion and increased tension across the world. Additionally, emerging nations lose revenue to more prosperous nations to build nuclear power, perpetually ensuring continuity in poverty . According to researchers, several countries across the globe have additionally used the vague cover of nuclear power development as a guide in the development of nuclear weapons
While nuclear power is high and sustainable for the long term, its limitation out the way its benefits considering that there is a better alternative with similar costs and nearly zero irreversible consequences on ecosystem exposed to it. Nuclear power is vulnerable to terrorists, and world peace since its failure or development could lead to weapons or disastrous environmental damages. Additionally, nuclear development is costlier than other renewable energy such as the wind or sun, since it will need constant human costs and lifetime maintenance of its byproducts.

Bibliography
Chowdhury, Navid. Is nuclear energy renewable energy? 2012.
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/chowdhury2/
Grandin, Karl, Peter Jagers, and Sven Kullander. “Nuclear Energy.” Ambio 39, 2010, 26-30.
Rhodes, Richard. Why nuclear power must be part of the energy solution. 2018.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-nuclear-power-must-be-part-of-the-energy-solution- environmentalists-climate.
U.S. Department of Energy. 3 reasons why nuclear is clean and sustainable. 2020.
https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/3-reasons-why-nuclear-clean-and-sustainable
Tsoukalas, Lefteri H., Rong Gao, And Eugene D. Coyle. “A Future Role For Nuclear Energy?” In Understanding The Global Energy Crisis, Edited By Coyle Eugene D. And Simmons Richard A., 167-90. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press, 2014.

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Response-s I was pleased to read your post »Cybercrime