Top Research Professionals
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
For similar papers and sample answers; with a few clicks, Order your research paper, thesis, dissertation writing and other assignment help services
Posted: October 15th, 2022
HCM 340 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Since the turn of the century, there has been an increased focus on transforming the U.S. healthcare delivery system. Several reports have cited the enormous
divide, or chasm, that exists between the healthcare system as we actually receive it versus the ideal system that we strive to achieve. While there have been
numerous efforts aimed at optimizing the care delivered to all individuals in our society, many gaps still remain that prevent us from fundamentally reaching that
ideal.
For your final project, you will research a gap in the access to quality, equity, or efficiency of care (including existing initiatives involving economic and regulatory
factors currently in place).
• Option One: A gap in quality related to care coordination for individuals with chronic illnesses
• Option Two: A gap in equity related to mental health access for veterans
• Option Three: A gap in efficiency related to rising cost of pharmaceuticals for the aging population
This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
• Draw connections between current healthcare delivery systems and the context in which they were developed
• Describe the impact of economic and regulatory drivers on healthcare delivery systems
• Identify major gaps in access to healthcare for determining areas of opportunity for improved access to quality healthcare
• Explain initiatives targeted at maintaining or improving the health status of specific populations
Prompt
After choosing the topic for your course project from the options provided in the overview, you will work to develop your healthcare delivery systems research
paper. Within the final research project, you will address your chosen gap in access, including existing initiatives in place to address the gap and economic and
regulatory factors that are currently in place to address the gap.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction
A. Describe a specific gap in the delivery of healthcare. Include the specific population affected by the gap.
B. Briefly describe the history of this gap in access to healthcare. Has this been an issue historically, or is it a modern issue?
C. Explain the impact that the socioeconomic background of the population has on their access to healthcare.
D. Describe how the healthcare delivered to the population is affected by the gap in access.
E. Predict any potential implications if this gap in access is not addressed.
II. Existing Initiatives
A. Explain an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access.
B. Explain the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access.
C. Describe the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative. Consider when it was developed and what factors were
considered.
D. Describe the resources required to fund the existing initiative.
E. Explain why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement.
III. Regulation
A. Explain a current regulation regarding the existing initiative that has been identified and the context in which it was developed. Why is this
regulation important?
B. Describe the regulatory level that the existing initiative is being addressed at. Consider the potential for multiple levels of regulation.
IV. Conclusion: Explain the effectiveness of the existing initiative and associated regulations in addressing this gap in the delivery of healthcare to the target
population. Does the initiative align with initiative in place to support other gaps? Are there conflicting interests to be aware of?
Milestones
Milestone One: Topic Selection
In Module Three, you will submit a 2- to 3-page paper explaining why the topic you chose is a gap in healthcare and analyze the specific population impacted by
the issue. This assignment will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Existing Initiatives
In Module Five, you will submit a 2- to 3-page paper in which you will identify and analyze an initiative that addresses the gap you chose as the topic for your
final project. This assignment will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Final Submission: Healthcare Delivery Systems Research Paper
In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final project. It should
reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your healthcare delivery systems research paper should be 5 to 8 pages. It should be double-spaced, include one-inch margins, use
12-point Times New Roman font, and at least three sources cited in APA formatting.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Introduction: Gap Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates keen
insight into the healthcare
delivery processes
Describes a specific gap in the
delivery of healthcare, including
the specific population affected
by the gap
Describes a specific gap in the
delivery of healthcare, including
the specific population affected
by the gap, but the description
is cursory or contains
inaccuracies
Does not describe a specific gap
in the delivery of healthcare to
a specific population
7.9
Introduction: History Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of the
premise of the gap
Briefly describes the history of
this gap in access to healthcare
Describes the history of this gap
in access to healthcare, but
description is verbose or
contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the history of
this gap in access to healthcare
7.9
Introduction:
Socioeconomic
Background
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
the explanation demonstrates a
sophisticated awareness of the
relationship between
socioeconomic status and
access to healthcare
Explains the impact
socioeconomic background has
on a population’s access to
healthcare
Explains the impact
socioeconomic background has
on a population’s access to
healthcare, but explanation is
cursory or illogical
Does not explain the impact
socioeconomic background has
on a population’s access to
healthcare
7.9
Introduction: Affect Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of the
healthcare delivery processes as
they relate to consumer access
Describes how the healthcare
delivered to the population is
affected by the gap in access
Describes how the healthcare
delivered to the population is
affected by the gap in access,
but description cursory or
contains inaccuracies
Does not describe how the
healthcare delivered to the
population is affected by the
gap in access
7.9
Introduction:
Implications
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
predictions demonstrate a
sophisticated awareness of the
interrelationship between
healthcare access and other
variables
Predicts any potential
implications if this gap in access
is not addressed
Predicts any potential
implications if this gap in access
is not addressed, but
predictions are unrealistic or
unrelated
Does not predict any potential
implications if this gap in access
is not addressed
7.9
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Existing Initiatives:
Address Gap
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates keen
insight into the needs for
addressing the gap
Explains an existing healthcare
initiative that was put in place
to address this gap in access
Explains an existing healthcare
initiative that was put in place
to address this gap in access,
but explanation is cursory or
contains inaccuracies
Does not explain an existing
healthcare initiative that was
put in place to address this gap
in access
7.9
Existing Initiatives:
Goals
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of the
purpose of the existing initiative
Explains the specific goals of the
existing initiative in place to
address this gap in access
Explains the specific goals of the
existing initiative in place to
address this gap in access, but
explanation is cursory or
contains inaccuracies
Does not explain the specific
goals of the existing initiative in
place to address this gap in
access
7.9
Existing Initiatives:
Development
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
sophisticated awareness of the
elements involved in the
development of initiatives
Describes the circumstances
around the development of the
existing initiative
Describes the circumstances
around the development of the
existing initiative, but
description is unclear or
incomplete
Does not describe the
circumstances around the
development of the existing
initiative
7.9
Existing Initiatives:
Resources
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
complex grasp of the funding
requirements of healthcare
delivery initiatives
Describes the resources
required to fund the existing
initiative
Describes the resources
required to fund the existing
initiative, but description is
illogical or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the resources
required to fund the existing
initiative
7.9
Existing Initiatives:
Improvement
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates keen
insight into the needs of the
initiative and its shortcomings
Explains why the existing
initiative is not meeting its
intended purpose and now
requires improvement
Explains why the existing
initiative is not meeting its
intended purpose and now
requires improvement, but
explanation is cursory or
contains inaccuracies
Does not explain why the
existing initiative is not meeting
its intended purpose and now
requires improvement
7.9
Regulation: Current
Regulation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates a
sophisticated awareness of how
context influences the
development of regulations
Explains a current regulation
regarding the existing initiatives
that have been identified and
the context in which it was
developed
Explains a current regulation
regarding the existing initiatives
that have been identified and
the context in which it was
developed, but explanation is
cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain a current
regulation regarding the existing
initiatives that have been
identified and the context in
which it was developed
7.9
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Regulation:
Regulatory Level
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description demonstrates a
nuanced understanding of
regulatory control levels
Describes the regulatory level at
which the existing initiatives are
being addressed
Describes the regulatory level at
which the existing initiatives are
being addressed, but
description is cursory or
unrelated
Does not describe the
regulatory level at which that
the existing initiatives are being
addressed
7.9
Conclusion Meets “Proficient” criteria and
explanation demonstrates a
complex grasp of the
relationship between individual
initiatives and the healthcare
system
Explains the effectiveness of the
existing initiative and associated
regulations in addressing this
gap in the delivery of healthcare
to the target population
Explains the effectiveness of the
existing initiative and associated
regulations in addressing this
gap in the delivery of healthcare
to the target population, but
explanation is cursory or
unrelated to the overall
healthcare system
Does not explain the role of this
gap in the delivery of healthcare
to the population or the
initiative in place to address this
gap
2.6
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy to read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
2.6
Total 100%
We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by college students.
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
Our custom writing services maintain the highest quality while remaining affordable for students. Our pricing for research papers, theses, and dissertations is not only fair considering the superior quality but also competitive with other writing services.
We guarantee plagiarism-free, human-written content. Every product is assured to be original and not AI-generated. Our writers, tutors and editors are research experts who ensures the right formating and citation sytles are followed. To note, all the final drafts undergo rigorous plagiarism checks before delivery for submission to ensure authenticity for our valued customers.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: