Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.
Posted: March 2nd, 2022
In 2012 in an interview about her documentary, Cocaine Unwrapped director Rachel Seifert told journalist Nick Curtis of the London Evening Standard, that:
“I don’t have a moral issue with people taking cocaine, per se. I think we have to accept the fact that people will always take drugs. A lot of us have tried it, and a lot of people like it. If rich people in London want to take cocaine, then let them. But they have to acknowledge they are part of a chain, and should be standing up and demanding that it shouldn’t be attached to death, destruction and blood at the other end.” [emphasis added by Timmons]
Given that statement, answer the following questions in a post of three paragraphs (one paragraph to answer each of the enumerated questions).
1. Is Seifert’s statement:
an assumption
a hypothesis
a form of analysis
or political rhetoric?
2. Describe how Seifert’s film supports what Drugs: Policy, Social Costs, Crime and Justice author Zilney would call an “alternative approach” to drug control. What type of “alternative approach” is Seifert recommending?
3. What questions does Seifert’s documentary neither pose nor answer about contemporary drug control but which merit consideration?
Give scholarly reasons (based in evidence–examples, quotes, etc.) for your answer drawn from Zilney, Cocaine Unwrapped, and other reputable sources.
This is also due tonight at 11 pm MT. time
———–
In a 2012 interview about her documentary, Cocaine Unwrapped filmmaker Rachel Seifert told London Evening Standard journalist Nick Curtis:
“I don’t have a moral problem with people using cocaine. I believe we must face the fact that people will always use drugs. Many of us have tried it, and many people enjoy it. Allow rich individuals in London to use cocaine if they want to. But they must recognize that they are a link in a chain and must rise up and demand that it not be linked to murder, destruction, and blood at the other end.” [Timmons added emphasis]
Given that statement, answer the following questions in three paragraphs (one for each).
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Our writing team is assembled through a rigorous selection process, where we handpick accomplished writers with specialized expertise in distinct subject areas and a proven track record in academic writing. Each writer brings a unique blend of knowledge and skills to the table, ensuring that our content is not only informative but also engaging and accessible to a general college student audience
Competitive pricing is a cornerstone of our service, where we balance affordability with exceptional quality. In offering the best writers at rates that rival other writing services, we ensure that students can access top-notch content without breaking the bank unnecessarily. Our fair and transparent pricing structure is designed to provide value for money, making us a go-to choice for students seeking high-quality writing services at an affordable price.
Academic integrity is paramount to our writing service, which is why we produce original research and writing content for every paper. Each piece of work is carefully written from scratch, ensuring that every sentence, paragraph, and page is authentic and free from plagiarism. Our rigorous quality control process involves thorough scanning of every final draft, guaranteeing that the content meets the highest standards of originality and academic integrity. With keen attention to citation and referencing, we ensure that every source is properly credited, giving you complete peace of mind. We also have the best plagiarism checkers like safeassign and turnitin thus providing similarity score for each paper.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: