Posted: May 11th, 2022

DEVRY NR305 WEEK 2 Journal Article Review Assignment

Journal Article Assessment:
Pointers and Grading Rubric
Function
The coed will learn an
assigned nursing article and write a critique associated to a specific subject.
Course Outcomes
This task permits the coed to satisfy the next course
outcomes:
CO #Three: Make the most of efficient communication when
performing a well being evaluation. (PO #Three)
CO #5: Discover the skilled
duties concerned in conducting a complete well being evaluation and
offering acceptable documentation. (PO #6)
Factors
This task is price a complete of 100 factors.
Due Date
The finished Journal
Article Assessment file is to be submitted to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday
of Week 2. Submit inquiries to the weekly Q & A Discussion board. Contact your
teacher in case you want extra help.See the Course Insurance policies
relating to late assignments. Failure to submit your paper to the Dropbox on time
could end in a deduction of factors.
Instructions
1.
Obtain
the next article from the Chamberlain library. See “Looking
Databases-Ideas for locating Assigned Articles.docx” from the Doc Sharing tab if
you’re unfamiliar with downloading articles from the library.
The APA formatted
reference is beneath:
Fawcett,
T., & Rhynas, S. (2012) Taking a affected person historical past: The position of the nurse. Nursing Customary, 26(24), 41-46.
The
parts of the reference are:
Authors: Fawcett, T., & Rhynas, S.
Date: 2012
Title: Taking a affected person historical past: the position of the nurse.
Journal: Nursing Customary, Quantity 26, Subject 24,
pages 41-46.

2.
Learn
the article fastidiously and take notes. Spotlight essential factors within the article
which are useful to you and different college students.
Three.
Use
Microsoft Phrase 2010 (or later) to sort the paper.
Four.
The
size of the paper is to be now not than 4 (Four) pages excluding title web page
and reference web page. Further pages is not going to be learn and won’t rely towards your
grade.
5.
APA
format is required. Embrace a title web page and a reference web page. The physique of the
paper ought to have 4 sections with these headings:
a.
Introduction

b.
Abstract
of the Article
c.
Analysis
of the Article
d.
Conclusion
6.
Use scholarly
writing together with right English grammar, syntax and sentence construction.
7.
Submit
the paper to the Journal Article Assessment basket within the Drop Field by Sunday, 11:59
p.m. MT, on the finish of Week 2. Please put up questions on this
task to the weekly Q & A Boards so all the class could view the
solutions.

Grading Standards

Class

Factors

%

Description

Introduction

Three

Three

The Introduction is the primary a part of the physique of the paper. It
ought to be one paragraph that embrace:
·
Creator(s)
full title,
·
Article
title
·
Journal
title
·
Date
of publication

Abstract of the
article

37

37

The Abstract is the
second a part of the physique of the paper. It ought to embrace:
·
Focus
of the article
·
Well being
evaluation process and rationales mentioned
·
Well being
evaluation instruments and/or methods mentioned

Analysis of
the Article

30

30

Consider the article. Embrace
a FULL ONE-to-TWO web page critique that answersall of the next
questions:
·
What
was achieved effectively and what may have been improved within the article?
·
Did
this text curiosity you? In that case, clarify why. If not, clarify this response.
·
Was
the well being evaluation technique useful? Might you undertake it in your
apply?
·
Was
the well being evaluation technique defined clearly?
·
Ought to
extra analysis articles be written about this space of well being evaluation?
·
What
inhabitants or people would profit essentially the most from data reported in
this text?

Conclusion

10

10

Establish the principle
concepts and main help factors from the physique of your report. Omit minor
particulars. Summarize the advantages of correct evaluation for the affected person.

Scholarly
writing

15

15

Use commonplace English grammar and sentence construction. Make no spelling
or typographical errors. Set up the paper in line with the required elements
together with using acceptable headers.

APA format

5

5

Comply with APA
formatting in line with the sixth version of the Publication Handbook of the American
Psychological Affiliation. Embrace a Title web page and References web page.
Comply with the APA guidelines for margins, font sort, font dimension, and so on. Create an
in-text for all data talked about that seems in one other supply, even when
you summarize the data. The References listing ought to embrace all sources
talked about in in-text citations. Likewise, your References ought to solely listing
sources which are cited within the physique of the paper.

Whole

100

100%

A high quality paper will meet or exceed the entire
above necessities.

Grading Rubric

Task
Standards

A
(92-100%)
Excellent
or highest stage of efficiency

B
(84-91%)
Very
good or excessive stage of efficiency

C
(76-83%)
Competent
or passable stage of efficiency

D/F
(Zero-75%)
Poor
or failing or unsatisfactory stage of efficiency

Introduction
(Three pts)

Full and full identification of article together with the creator(s)
full title, article title, journal title, and date of publication.
Three factors

Incomplete identification of one of many following: the creator(s) full
title, article title, journal title, and date of publication.
2 level

Partial identification of article required parts.
1 level

No Introduction
Zero factors

Abstract
of the article
(37 pts)

Abstract full; completely covers all required parts.
34–37 factors

Abstract is incomplete and/or 1 required parts shouldn’t be lined.
31–33 factors

Abstract is incomplete and/or 2 required parts should not lined.
28-30 factors

Abstract shouldn’t be included
and/or not one of the required parts are lined.
Zero-27
factors

Analysis
of the Article
(30 pts)

Wonderful critique of article demonstrates crucial pondering; answered
all required questions.
27–30 factors

Critique demonstrated fundamental understanding of article; answered all
however 1 of the required questions.
25–26 factors

Poor critique of article; lacks crucial or authentic pondering. Failed
to reply 1-2 questions.
22-24 factors

Poor critique of article; lacks crucial or authentic pondering. Failed
to reply Three or extra questions.
Zero-21
factors

Conclusion
(10 pts)

Wonderful understanding of article. Authentic rationalization is effectively
evidenced and developed.
9–10
factors

Fundamental understanding
and/or restricted use of authentic rationalization and/or inappropriate emphasis on
an space.
7–Eight
factors

Little understanding of article. Little to no authentic rationalization;
inappropriate emphasis on an space.
5–6 factors

Conclusion shouldn’t be
included orLittle to no authentic
rationalization of understanding of article contents.

Zero-Four
factors

Scholarly
writing
(15 pts)

Wonderful use of normal English exhibiting authentic thought. No
spelling or grammar errors. Nicely organized with good movement of which means.
13–15 factors

Some proof of personal expression & competently makes use of language. 1-2 spelling
or grammar errors Nicely organized.
11–12 factors

Some proof of personal expression & competently makes use of language. Extra
than 2 spelling or grammar errors Nicely organized.
9–10 factors

Language wants improvement. Many spelling and/or grammar errors.
Poorly organized ideas and ideas.
Zero-Eight
factors

APA
format
(5
pts)

APA right with minimal errors.
5 factors

2-Three errors in APA, grammar, spelling, or syntax, and/or 1-2 citations
are lacking.
Three-Four
factors

Three-5 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, or syntax, and/or greater than 2
citations are lacking.
1-2 factors

APA, grammar, spelling and/or punctuation comprise a number of errors and/or
many citations are lacking.
Zero-1
factors

Whole
Factors Attainable = 100 factors