Top Research Professionals
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
Boost Your Final Grades By Ordering Custom Writing Help!
For similar papers and sample answers; with a few clicks, Order your research paper, thesis, dissertation writing and other assignment help services
Posted: April 14th, 2022
Community Partner And Resources
Instructions
Collaborate with community members, community liaisons, and/or members of health care team regarding your project. Identify these community partners and collect information regarding the assets and resources of your selected community, and how. Relate how they will be helpful in implementing your project. (These don’t have to be large organizations, but can be people instrumental to your project.)
This assignment will include:
1. Introduction
2. List at least 2 Community Partners and 2 community resources
3. Describe their roles in your project.
4. Conclusion
Additional Instructions:
· References (minimum of 2 references cited in the content)
· Minimum of 2 pages (not including title and reference page)
· Your assignment should be typed into a word document and formatted in APA style. The assignment must include:
· A title page and a reference page
NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric
NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
10 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.
9 pts
Level 4
Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.
8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.
7 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.
6 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
20 pts
Level 5
Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).
18 pts
Level 4
Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
16 pts
Level 3
Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
14 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.
12 pts
Level 1
Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
18 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
16 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
14 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
12 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
20 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
18 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
16 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
14 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
12 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
10 pts
Level 5
Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.
9 pts
Level 4
Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.
8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.
7 pts
Level 2
Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
6 pts
Level 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.
0 pts
Level 0
States an illogical conclusion from findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
5 pts
Level 5
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
4.5 pts
Level 4
Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
4 pts
Level 3
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
3.5 pts
Level 2
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
3 pts
Level 1
Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0 pts
Level 0
Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
3 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
2.7 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
2.4 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
2.1 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
1.8 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
2 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
1.8 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.6 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.4 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.2 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and r
Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: Ethics »Module 02 Discussion – Disorders of the Central Nervous System (CNS)Why Choose our Custom Writing Services
We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by college students.
Discounted Pricing
Our custom writing services maintain the highest quality while remaining affordable for students. Our pricing for research papers, theses, and dissertations is not only fair considering the superior quality but also competitive with other writing services.
0% Similarity Index
We guarantee plagiarism-free, human-written content. Every product is assured to be original and not AI-generated. Our writers, tutors and editors are research experts who ensures the right formating and citation sytles are followed. To note, all the final drafts undergo rigorous plagiarism checks before delivery for submission to ensure authenticity for our valued customers.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: