Posted: April 20th, 2022

Aspects and Expectations of a Quality Ecology Project

Aspects and Expectations of a Quality Ecology Project
Expectation Introduction Exp. Design & Execution Data Analysis & Results Discussion Writing Literature
Fair The introduction is inadequate, background unrelated, or only slightly relevant to the question

Question not stated or stated inappropriately

Points: 9 The study design doesn’t allow for proper controls

Inadequate replication of treatments

Evidence of sloppy execution

Points: 12 No statistical analysis

Fails to identify trends or identifies false trends

Analysis and/or interpretations are inadequate or missing

Points: 9 Reach the wrong conclusion

Does not relate results to question or introduction

Interprets results incorrectly

Points: 12 Poor grammar or punctuation

Writing is jumpy, does not flow in a logical manner

The main point is not logically developed and paragraph to paragraph disconnected

Points: 9 Does not incorporate literature

Used not relevant literature

Incorrect citation format

Points: 9
Good The introduction provides appropriate background that justifies the question

The question is clearly stated

The null hypothesis is stated correctly

Points: 12 The study design is unambiguous

Adequate & appropriate replication of treatments & controls

Execution adequate

Points: 16 Appropriate statistical tools are used

Analysis and/or interpretations are present but does not enhance and/or explain the content

Points: 12 A scientific interpretation of the results is provided

The conclusion is adequate, summarizes the main point, and simply restates the introduction

Points: 16 Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct

Data are presented in easy-to-understand tables and/or figures

The main point is logically developed from sentence to sentence & paragraph to paragraph

Points: 12 At least 3 relevant citations are incorporated into a paper

Citations are used whenever referencing another person’s work or ideas, and the literature cited section

Points: 12

Excellent Question/hypothesis contains detailed background and is placed into the context of recent scientific findings in the area of interest

Points: 15 Evidence that meticulous attention has been paid to all aspects of the experimental design and execution

Points: 20 Data trends are identified.

Analysis and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content

Points: 15 Possible theoretical and practical applications of the results are presented and discussed

Conclusions effectively wrap up/gives closure to the main points of the paper.

Points: 20 The discussion ends with a cohesive concluding paragraph that places the results of the study into a real-world context

Points: 15 More than 3 citations are used, and the use of citation indicates that student understands the significance of the study to the body of knowledge on the topic

Points: 15
Score

——–

Aspects and Expectations of a High-Quality Ecology Project Introduction, Experimentation, Design, and Execution Discussion of Data Analysis and Results Writing Literature Fair The introduction is inadequate, background unrelated, or only slightly relevant to the question

Question not stated or stated inappropriately

Points: 9

The study design doesn’t allow for proper controls

Inadequate replication of treatments

Evidence of sloppy execution

Points: 12 No statistical analysis

Fails to identify trends or identifies false trends

Analysis and/or interpretations are inadequate or missing

Points: 9

Reach the wrong conclusion

Does not relate results to question or introduction

Interprets results incorrectly

Points: 12

Poor grammar or punctuation

Writing is jumpy, does not flow in a logical manner

The main point is not logically developed and paragraph to paragraph disconnected

Points: 9 Does

Check Price Discount

Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: This folder contains a Lab #2 case scenario, a participant data file, »In a 3-page paper, written in APA format using proper spelling/grammar,