Fill the details/instructions form and checkout for your essay - pro writers; top college graduates only in less than 5 mins, NO AI—Plagiarism-free!.
Posted: May 15th, 2023
A Consequentialist Approach to Ethical and Legal Issues Involving Patients Who Refuse Medical Treatment
Patients have the right to refuse medical treatment, even if that treatment is necessary to save their life. This right is based on the principle of autonomy, which holds that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their own bodies. However, there are some cases in which patients’ refusals of treatment can raise ethical and legal issues.
In this paper, I will argue that a consequentialist approach can be used to resolve these issues. Consequentialism is a moral theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its consequences. In the context of medical treatment, a consequentialist approach would focus on the potential benefits and harms of both providing and withholding treatment.
The Benefits and Harms of Providing Treatment
There are a number of potential benefits to providing medical treatment to patients who refuse it. First, treatment can save the patient’s life. Second, treatment can improve the patient’s quality of life. Third, treatment can prevent the patient from suffering pain and discomfort. Fourth, treatment can prevent the patient from spreading a disease to others.
However, there are also a number of potential harms to providing medical treatment to patients who refuse it. First, treatment can be expensive. Second, treatment can have side effects that can harm the patient. Third, treatment can violate the patient’s autonomy. Fourth, treatment can lead to the patient feeling like they are being forced to do something they do not want to do.
The Benefits and Harms of Withholding Treatment
There are also a number of potential benefits to withholding medical treatment from patients who refuse it. First, it respects the patient’s autonomy. Second, it avoids the potential harms of treatment, such as expense, side effects, and violation of autonomy. Third, it allows the patient to die with dignity.
However, there are also a number of potential harms to withholding medical treatment from patients who refuse it. First, it can lead to the patient’s death. Second, it can cause the patient to suffer pain and discomfort. Third, it can prevent the patient from spreading a disease to others.
A Consequentialist Approach to Resolving Ethical and Legal Issues
A consequentialist approach to resolving ethical and legal issues involving patients who refuse medical treatment would weigh the potential benefits and harms of both providing and withholding treatment. In some cases, it may be clear that providing treatment is the best course of action, even if the patient refuses it. For example, if a patient is refusing treatment that is necessary to save their life, then it is likely that providing treatment will produce the best overall outcome.
In other cases, it may be more difficult to determine whether providing or withholding treatment is the best course of action. For example, if a patient is refusing treatment that will improve their quality of life but is not necessary to save their life, then it may be more difficult to say which course of action will produce the best overall outcome.
In these cases, a consequentialist approach would involve weighing the potential benefits and harms of both providing and withholding treatment, taking into account the patient’s wishes, the patient’s medical condition, and the patient’s likely prognosis. Ultimately, the decision of whether to provide or withhold treatment would be made on a case-by-case basis.
Conclusion
A consequentialist approach can be used to resolve ethical and legal issues involving patients who refuse medical treatment. This approach involves weighing the potential benefits and harms of both providing and withholding treatment, taking into account the patient’s wishes, the patient’s medical condition, and the patient’s likely prognosis. Ultimately, the decision of whether to provide or withhold treatment would be made on a case-by-case basis.
References
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Brock, D. W. (2019). Life and death decision making. Oxford University Press.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2017). Bioethics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Wilkinson, D. (2018). The ethics of patient care: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge
Every student wants the best grades and that’s our Focus
Our team consists of outstanding writers who have specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and professionals experienced in academic research writing. They hold at least a graduate degree—230 with Masters and MSN qualifications, experts carefully selected and trained to ensure the best quality of our work. .
We’re dedicated to bringing on board top-notch writers who can provide excellent work at prices that make sense for college students; affordable papers. Our goal? To give you the best bang for your buck without ever compromising on the quality of our essay writing services—or the content of your paper. #Don’t forget to use the DISCOUNT code in the COUPONS section of the order form before you pay!.
The service guarantees that our final work is 100% original, rearched and human written expertly. We are committed to delivering plagiarism-free and AI-free work to each university/college student's 'write my paper' request. To uphold this promise, we check every draft for any possible instances of duplication, wrong citation, grammar errors and artificiality before we send it to you. Thus, you can always rely on us to write genuine and high-standard content for your essay assignments.
When you trust to place an order with Homework Ace Tutors, here is what happens: