Top Research Professionals
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
For similar papers and sample answers; with a few clicks, Order your research paper, thesis, dissertation writing and other assignment help services
Posted: February 26th, 2022
Criteria Ratings Points
Executive Summary
8 to >6.0 pts
Advanced
• Provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents. • Contains enough information about the case study. • Captures the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides key evidence for the major points. • Closes with a brief summary and rationale for the chosen strategy.
6 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• Provides an overview of the paper’s contents. • Contains some information about the case study. • Captures most of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides most key evidence for the major points. • Closes with a brief summary that contains some rationale for the chosen strategy.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Provides a less than clear overview of the paper’s contents. • Lacking in information about the case study. • Captures some of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides some key evidence for the major points. • Brief summary and rationale are lacking in content for the chosen strategy.
0 pts
Not Present
8 pts
Alternative Strategies
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Lists two or more alternative strategies (giving advantages and alternatives for each).
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Lists 1 or more alternative strategies giving some advantages and alternatives for each.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Lists less than 2 alternative strategies and gives a minimum amount of advantages and alternatives for each.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Pro-Forma Financial Statements
30 to >26.0 pts
Advanced
• Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy. • Includes Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the
26 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
• Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years with minor errors. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy, with 2-5 minor errors. • Includes most of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 without strategy, there are greater than 6 errors. • Includes some of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric | BUSI690_B06_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
NPV and Cost Analysis
20 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
• Develops an NPV figure/table. • Clearly articulates the cost of the strategy (-cf0). • Clearly articulates the subsequent Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV analysis. • Thoroughly analyzes the NPV.
16 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
• Develops an NPV figure/table, some minor errors. • Articulates the cost of the strategy (-cf0). • Articulates the subsequent Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV analysis. • Analyzes the NPV.
11 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Develops an NPV figure/table, calculation is incorrect or missing key components. • Discusses but does not include details of the cost of the strategy (-cf0). • Discusses the Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV, lacks detail and thoughtful analysis. • Discusses the NPV, analysis should be further developed.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Implementation of Strategic Plan
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Includes an actionable timetable agenda for accomplishing the new strategy. • Addresses the key items of who, what, how, and when of the implementation process.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
• Includes a timetable agenda, with most details, for accomplishing the new strategy. • Addresses most of the key items of who, what, how, and when of the implementation process.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Includes a basic timetable agenda for accomplishing the new strategy, additional details are needed. • Addresses some of the key items of who, what, how, and when of the implementation process.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Recommended Strategies and Objectives
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
• Thoroughly analyzes the new strategy. • States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy. • Explains the benefits of the new strategy for long term organizational success. • Outlines the challenges and/or disadvantages of the strategic choice.
17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
• Analyzes the new strategy. • States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy, minor details missing. • Explains the benefits of the new strategy for long term organizational success. • Outlines the challenges and/or disadvantages of the strategic choice.
15 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Thoroughly analyzes the new strategy. • States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy, missing details. • Explains the benefits of the new strategy for long term organizational success. • Outlines the challenges and/or disadvantages of the strategic choice.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric | BUSI690_B06_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Grammar, Spelling, Format, and References
42 to >35.0 pts
Advanced
Proper spelling and grammar are used. APA format including a cover page, citations and references are correct. Matrices were included and properly labeled.
35 to >30.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1–4 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. Matrices were mostly included but there were a few errors or missing a few data items.
30 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 5–9 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. Some matrices were included but there were errors or missing data.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 10 spelling, grammar, format, or citation errors are present.
42 pts
Total Points: 140
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric | BUSI690_B06_202220
Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: Please select two of the following options and answer each of the questions related to that option. »Business ProposalWe prioritize delivering top quality work sought by college students.
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
Our custom writing services maintain the highest quality while remaining affordable for students. Our pricing for research papers, theses, and dissertations is not only fair considering the superior quality but also competitive with other writing services.
We guarantee plagiarism-free, human-written content. Every product is assured to be original and not AI-generated. Our writers, tutors and editors are research experts who ensures the right formating and citation sytles are followed. To note, all the final drafts undergo rigorous plagiarism checks before delivery for submission to ensure authenticity for our valued customers.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: