Top Tutors
The team is composed solely of exceptionally skilled graduate writers, each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and extensive expertise in academic writing.
Click to fill the order details form in a few minute.
Posted: April 13th, 2023
Final Presentation Brief
Assignment: Persuasive Presentation Activity brief
BCO122 – Oral Communication Skills
Online campus
Description PowerPoint and Video presentation (including recording) to persuade your audience on a particular topic.
You must use the Harvard Referencing System. If you take information from outside sources – you must cite these clearly.
There will be 3 parts:
• Forum Video presentation of topic – Prerequisite to start the final – in week 9
• Outline submission – 20%
• PowerPoint with link to video – 80% Format This activity must meet the following formatting requirements:
• Clear slides with appropriate visuals & Sans Serif fonts
• 8 – 10 slides (not including cover slide or final slide)
• The last slide must contain a link to the video recording – use PowerPoint Video or Screencast if you MacBook
• Video recording 10 minutes max.
Goal(s) To produce an effective persuasive presentation. To produce a professional-looking PowerPoint To present clearly and effectively Due date 1. Forum Video presentation of topic – 18th April 23.59 CEST
2. Outline submission – 23rd April 23.59h CEST
3. PowerPoint with link to video – 9th May 23.59h CEST
Weight towards final grade This activity has a weight of 60% towards the final grade.
Learning outcomes Learning outcomes assessed in this assignment:
• Understand the differences between verbal and nonverbal communication and how to use each effectively, being aware of the influence of each on effective communication.
• Demonstrate the ability to research, organize, prepare, and deliver individual oral presentations.
• Create effective visual aids that will enhance oral presentations. Assessment criteria See rubrics below.
Rubric: Outline (20%)
Exceptional
100-90 Good
89-80 Fair
79-70 Marginal Fail
69-60 Fail
<60
Opening elements: Specific purpose in place. Open Missing one of the Some opening elements Few opening elements Opening elements are not
– Title
– Attention Statement
– Introduction
25% with attention statement.
Introduction provides a clear purpose of the presentation. Clear, engaging attention opening elements. Opening elements not correctly stated. Improper formatting. are not identified or missing. Some formatting in place. are there. No formatting in most of the document. identified or missing. No formatting in place.
statement.
Connect with audience by
stating relevancy of the
presentation.
Preview main ideas.
Format of opening
correct e.g. using bullet points/
numbering.
Body 50% Main points are clearly identified. Sub and supporting points are in place. Complete sentences are used not key words. Very clear signposts and transition statements to bridge ideas together. Excellent spelling and grammar. Main points are identified as well as sub and supporting points. Complete sentences are used not key words.
Signposts and transition statements to bridge ideas together are there. Minor formatting, spelling or grammatical problems. There are some main points and subpoints but there are parts that are unorganized w/o sub or supporting points. Some signposts or transition statements are missing or incomplete. Some good formatting. Some spelling and/or grammatical errors, but these do not impede the message. There are few main points and subpoints but most is unorganized w/o sub or supporting points.
Signposts or transition statements are mostly missing or incomplete. Shows an attempt to format the document. A number of spelling and/or grammatical errors which impede the clarity of the message. There are no main points nor subpoints. The document is unorganized. All the signposts or transition statements are missing or incomplete. No attempt of formatting. Frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors making comprehension difficult.
Closing elements 25%
• Conclusion
• Residual Message Ideas are clearly summarized. Close with impact statement in place.
The impact statement is well placed. Format correct. Good summary statement and close with impact statement. The impact statement is well placed. Good formatting. Fairly adequate summary. The impact statement is slightly unclear. The impact statement is misplaced. Some formatting. Marginally inadequate summary. The impact statement is not clear or misplaced. The impact statement is misplaced. Little formatting. Failure to develop a summary or the summary is highly disorganized or lacks sense. The impact statement is missing, highly unclear and misplaced. No formatting.
Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation (30%)
Exceptional 100-90 Good
89-80 Fair
79-70 Marginal Fail
69-60 Fail
<60
Composition of visual aids
50% Visual aids are professionally designed, attractive, relevant and add to understanding. Support the development of the presentation Visual aids are professionally designed but there are too many (some irrelevant) or are missing. Support the
development of the presentation Visual aids are well designed. Generally, they support the argument, but some are irrelevant or unclear Visuals aids are fairly mundane and not always relevant to the presentation development. Some than spelling mistakes, but do not impede communication Visuals aids are poorly designed, containing only words and are read aloud. Frequent spelling/grammar mistakes. Relevance is not clear
Content 50% The content is clear, well developed and interesting. Conclusions are clearly justified. Appropriate language style and shows thorough, in-depth understanding of the subject area Competent development of content showing in- depth knowledge of subject area. The content is clear showing knowledge of the area.
Improvements would help to justify conclusions
Competent development of content showing in-depth knowledge of subject area. The content is generally clear but there are gaps in the development or information which is not relevant is given too much importance The content is a simple repetition of written work with no amendments to language or style. The development is confusing and does not justify conclusions
Rubric: Presentation Delivery (50%)
Rubrics Oral Delivery (40%) Exceptional 100-90 Good
89-80 Fair
79-70 Marginal Fail 69-60 Fail
<60
Vocal delivery (volume, projection, pace)
50% Shows excellent application of effective oral communication skills. Exceptionally adequate voice volume and projection. The pace of speaking is adequate at all times. Shows good application of effective oral communication skills.
Good performance in at least one vocal delivery skill, one non-verbal delivery skill and one language skill. Shows fair application of effective oral communication skills.
Fair performance in at least one vocal delivery skill, one non-verbal delivery skill and one language skill. Shows marginally inadequate application of slightly ineffective oral communication skills.
Marginally inadequate performance in at least one vocal delivery skill, one non-verbal delivery skill and one language skill. Shows inadequate application of ineffective oral communication skills. Very poor performance in one or more of the vocal delivery skills, non-verbal delivery skill or language skills.
Non-verbal delivery (eye contact, gestures/body, movement/facial, expression)
50% Excellent non-verbal delivery. Maintains eye contact when necessary, facial expression is engaging; uses slides only to illustrate his/her speech when necessary. Good non-verbal delivery. Maintains eye contact when necessary, facial expression is engaging; uses slides only to illustrate his/her speech when necessary Fairly adequate non- verbal delivery. The amount of eye contact is inadequate. The facial expression may be inadequate at times or misleading to the audience; uses slides excessively sometimes. Marginally inadequate non-verbal delivery.
There is an attempt to have proper eye contact and facial expression. There is an attempt to pace the use of slides even though it ends up being excessive. Inadequate non-verbal delivery. There is very little eye-contact and the facial expression is highly inadequate and misleading to the audience. The use of slides is highly inadequate due to excessive reading.
esearch paper writing service
We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by students.
The team is composed solely of exceptionally skilled graduate writers, each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and extensive expertise in academic writing.
Our writing services uphold the utmost quality standards while remaining budget-friendly for students. Our pricing is not only equitable but also competitive in comparison to other writing services available.
Guaranteed Plagiarism-Free Content: We assure you that every product you receive is entirely free from plagiarism. Prior to delivery, we meticulously scan each final draft to ensure its originality and authenticity for our valued customers.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens:
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.