Top Research Professionals
The research experts and assignment help team consists exclusively of highly qualified graduate writers, each professional with in-depth subject matter expertise and significant experience in custom academic writing.
Boost Your Final Grades By Ordering Custom Writing Help!
For similar papers and sample answers; with a few clicks, Order your research paper, thesis, dissertation writing and other assignment help services
Posted: February 23rd, 2022
Psychopathology
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. | 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current credible sources. | 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 credible references. | 31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references. | 0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only 1 or no credible references. | |
| Main Posting: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. | |
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation | 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main discussion by due date. | 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Posts main discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation. | 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Posts main discussion by due date. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main discussion by due date. | |
| First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. | 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| First Response: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. | |
| First Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. | 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. | |
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. | 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| Second Response: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. | |
| Second Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. | 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. | |
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Study Notes, Research Topics & Assignment Examples: Environmental Science Thesis Help »Public safetyWhy Choose our Custom Writing Services
We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by college students.
Discounted Pricing
Our custom writing services maintain the highest quality while remaining affordable for students. Our pricing for research papers, theses, and dissertations is not only fair considering the superior quality but also competitive with other writing services.
0% Similarity Index
We guarantee plagiarism-free, human-written content. Every product is assured to be original and not AI-generated. Our writers, tutors and editors are research experts who ensures the right formating and citation sytles are followed. To note, all the final drafts undergo rigorous plagiarism checks before delivery for submission to ensure authenticity for our valued customers.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Help, here is what happens: