Posted: September 28th, 2022

In the last two decades our country has seen a dramatic increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires. There are different viewpoints on what policies should be adopted to reduce this risk.

Some argue that smaller naturally occurring wildfires should be allowed to burn as they reduce fuel loads and are part of the ecosystem. Do you agree with the view in populated areas? o Some wealthy homeowners retain special insurance policies that will deploy private firefighters to protect only their house in the event of a wildfire. Is protecting specific houses in a widespread crisis ethically appropriate? Do you agree with the point of view in cities? o Some wealthy homeowners have special insurance policies that pay for private firefighters to protect only their home from a wildfire. Is it moral to protect certain houses during a widespread crisis?
Where woodland meets developed populated areas is termed the “Wildland/Urban Interface”. What steps do you think a homeowner could take on or around their property to reduce their exposure to wildland fires

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Lens of resiliency theory »Discuss the power of Social Darwinism