Posted: August 2nd, 2022

Health sciences and nursing
Download the Evaluating the Project template below
Gather the information from the surveys and attendance form.
Complete the Part 4 template with the following:
Title of presentation
Include community name in the title
Tables of results
PRE-Survey and POST-Survey results in numerical form
Comprehensive interpretation of results
Comprehensive summary of pre and post survey data in tables
Minimum of one paragraph
Include any positive or negative changes in pre and post-survey data
Minimum of one paragraph
Comprehensive reflection
Overall experience
Minimum of one paragraph
Summary of outcomes from the pre and post surveys i.e. does pre/post-survey data indicate participants may be more willing to implement SBIRT or Flag Program following the presentation? Did your presentation lead to further discussion about the topic with your audience?)
Minimum of one paragraph
Barriers to the project (i.e. participant interest, time, limited resources, willingness for change, etc.)
Minimum of one paragraph
Implications for future practice
How could this project impact your personal and professional practice?
Minimum of one paragraph
Direct Care Project Part 4
Evaluating the Project

Student Name: Date:

1. Title of presentation – Substance Use survey in Crestwood village within Manchester Township, Ocean County in New Jersey.

2. Date presentation completed ________________________________

3. Tables of results:

PRE-Survey

# Strongly Agree
Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 20 14 34 22 30
2 15 20 45 25 20
3 40 30 15 28 7
4 30 25 29 19 17
5 14 18 50 14 24
6 20 15 45 24 16
7 6 11 20 30 53
8 18 28 24 25 25

POST-Survey

# Strongly Agree
Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 40 30 10 15 25
2 45 25 15 20 20
3 60 40 3 10 7
4 30 35 19 19 17
5 50 28 7 21 14
6 40 50 10 14 6
7 53 40 6 20 20
8 25 48 14 15 18

4. Interpretation of results:
The Substance Use survey was conducted in Crestwood village within Manchester Township, Ocean County in New Jersey with 120 respondents being legible to participate. In the pre-survey the highest number of respondents (30) considers themselves to lack knowledge about substance abuse a community health problem. The same trend was observed in statement 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. However, a high number of the respondents were aware of the impact of the substance abuse to vulnerable population and believed it was a health issue in the community. The post-survey results indicate a higher number of respondents across the eight statements strongly agree or agree with the statements.

Based on the pre and post-survey, the positive changes observed include the number of respondents that strongly agreed or agreed improved significantly. The high number of respondents that believed substance abuse was an issue in the community and were familiar with the SBIRT intervention was a positive factor towards the implementation of the intervention. However, a negative change was observed, whereby the number of respondents that considered themselves knowledgeable about the substance abuse as community health problem remained higher than it would have been expected following the presentation.

5. Overall experience with the project:
The overall experience with the project is the interaction with the community and respondents throughout the project provided an opportunity to understand more about the impact of substance abuse to human day-to-day activities.

6. Summary of the outcomes:
The improvement from 46 (pre-survey) to 73 (post-survey) of the participants who considered implementing the SBIRT community intervention to address the substance abuse health problem was an indication that more individuals within Crestwood community may be willing to implement SBIRT. Additionally, the presentation lead to further discussion such as the means of which the substances find way into the community and possible legal approach the community can consider curbing the supply of abusive substances to and within the village.

7. Barriers in the project:
The project faced various barriers including the difficulty of identifying the participants that matched the requirement for respondents. About half of respondents did not have enough time take part in the presentation and survey due long working hours with busy schedules. The limited resources available for the project made it challenging to include more participants which could have further improved the survey results.

8. Implications for future practice:
The completion project was a milestone I my personal and professional practice. At the personal level, it would provide the satisfaction of taking part in helping a community overcome a health problem. Professionally, it would provide the base for getting more financial support to further my professional practice.

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Drone Technology »Previous Post